IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.07.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
W.P.No.31984 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
J.Maria Johnsi Rani ... Petitioner
vs.
1.Teachers Recruitment Board,
Rep. By Chairman,
College Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600 006.
3.The Director of School Education,
DPI Compound, College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent Teachers Recruitment Board to the petitioner to give marks for Question Nos.9,18,63,78,115,122 in the A set question paper as the final key answers published along with the final results on 05.11.2013 are wrong and to declare the petitioner successful in the Teacher's Eligibility Test (TET for short) examination, held on 18.08.2013 for the post of Bachelor of Teaching Assistant in Tamil as per the Notification dated 17.06.2013.
For Petitioner : Ms.L.Parvin Banu
For Respondents : Mr.D.KRishna Kumar,
Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This writ petition has been listed before me as a specially ordered case on the orders of the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice dated 25.06.2014.
2.The Teachers Recruitment Board, Government of Tamil Nadu, conducted Tamil Nadu Teachers' Eligibility Test-2013, as per the Notification No.3 of 2013, on 22.5.2013. The petitioner participated in the said examination. Her Roll Number is 13TE05202054. The question papers were in four series. The questions were of objective type. The petitioner was supplied with 'A' series question paper for Paper - II. She has secured 88 marks. According to the petitioner, for question Nos.9,18,63,11,5, 78 & 122 though, she had answered rightly, she has not been awarded each one mark to the said questions.
3.I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and I have also perused the records carefully.
4.It is brought to my notice by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the correctness of the said question Nos.9,18,63,11,5 & 122 have been decided by this Court in earlier writ petitions in W.P(MD) Nos.18223, 19032, 18334, 18567 & 18499 of 2013. In view of the said admitted position, no further adjudication is required in respect of the key answers for these questions.
5.Now, what remains to be adjudicated upon is question No.78 in Paper II 'A' Series. Question No.78 reads as follows:-
78.V, ye wheels
Stop ! Be silent for today.
A) Simile B) Metaphor
C)Personification D) Oxymoron
6.According to the Teachers Recruitment Board, option C (Personification) is the right answer. But, according to the petitioner, option D (Oxymoron) is the right answer.
7.Today, two experts in the said subject are present before this Court who are Ms.Ponni, Teacher from the Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Villivakkam, Chennai 600 049 and Ms.S.Vidya, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Virugambakkam, Chennai 600 092. This Court had the benefit of hearing them also. According to them, the said question refers to the figures of speech. The experts would further say that the figure of speech found in this question is Personification. According to them, Personification attributes inanimate of its abstract qualities. In this question, stop and silent are Personified and therefore, option C alone is the right answer.
8.But, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that for the said question, option D (Oxymoron) is the right answer. But, the experts would say that Oxymoron is the figure of speech in which, apparently contradictory terms appearing in conjunction like faith, un-faithful kept him falsely true. Referring to the same, the Experts would say that in the poem, given in the question, there are no contradictory terms in conjunction and therefore, the option D (Oxynmoron) is not the correct answer.
9.In the New Oxford Dictionary of English, the word Oxymoron is mentioned. It means, a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear conjunction. Thus, the opinion offered by the Experts is fully supported by the New Oxford Dictionary of English also.
10.At this juncture, I have to say that the power of this Court to interfere with the decision of experts in respect of key answers has been elaborately dealt with in a number of judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, about which, I need not elaborate. I deem it suffice to refer to the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in Kanpur University vs. Samir Gupta and Others reported in (1983) 4 Supreme Court Cases 309, wherein the Supreme Court has held that if the key answer is demonstrably wrong, then only, this Court has got power to interfere with the same. Applying the said decision, we have to examine this case as to whether the key answer set by the respondents is demonstrably wrong. Here, in this case, the petitioner is not able to demonstrate that the key answer pertaining to question No.78 is wrong.
11.In view of all the above, the writ petition fails and accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.07.2014
Index : Yes/No
jbm
To
1.Teachers Recruitment Board,
Rep. By Chairman,
College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006.
2.The Director of School Education,
DPI Compound, College Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006.
S.NAGAMUTHU,J.
jbm
W.P.No.31984 of 2013
02.07.2014
Sent from my iPad
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக