உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில்,குரூப் - 2' எழுதியவர்களின் மதிப்பெண்களை வெளியிட கோபிகிருஷ்ணன் என்பவர், தாக்கல் செய்த மனு மீது நீதியரசர் நாகமுத்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவின் முக்கிய பகுதி
In my considered opinion, in this scenario, where transparency is the hallmark of fairness on the part of the authorities concerned, there can be no justification to decline to publish the marks until the final results are published. If only the marks secured in the written examination are published, the candidate would be in a position to know as to why he was not called for the interview. When the marks can be disclosed to the individual candidates under the Right to Information Act, I do not find any reason as to why such information should be withheld without making it public thereby driving thousands of candidates to approach the respondent under the Right to Information Act. Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India, arbitrariness in any form has to be avoided. As a well known saying Caesar's wife must be above suspicion goes, in order to inform the general public that the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission has been fair in its approach, it ought to have published the marks of the candidates before going to the next stage viz., calling the candidates for the interview. In view of the said legal position, I am inclined to issue the direction as prayed for.
In the result, the writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to publish the marks of all the candidates in the written examination who had appeared in the CSSE-I Examination held on 04.11.2012, in the official website of the respondent, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக