TET தேர்வுக்கு விலக்களித்து சாண்றிதழ் சரிபார்ப்பு முடித்தவர்களுக்கு ஆசிரியர் பணிநியமனம் வழங்கக்கோரும் வழக்கில் டெல்லி உச்சநீதி மன்றம் தீர்ப்பு
சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் மீண்டும் விசாரிக்க உத்தரவு
ஏற்கனவே சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற தனி நீதிபதியும், டிவிஷன் பெஞ்சசும் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவுகள் ரத்துசெய்யப்படுகின்றன.கீழ்கண்ட 5 அம்சங்களை மீண்டும் பரிசீலித்து ஆணை வழங்க உத்தரவு
whether (i) the advertisement mentioned specific number of posts;
(ii) whether the posts mentioned have already been filled up;
(iii) whether the procedure of merit has been appositely followed;
(iv) whether therespondents despite being more meritorious have been left out and less meritorious candidates have been appointed; and
(v)whether assuming the advertisement did not mention the number of posts, the respondents still could claim a right in to have the appointment.
As the pertinent issues have not been addressed to by the High Court we set aside all the judgments and orders of the learned Single Judge as well of the Division Bench and remit the matter to the High Court to focus on the
aforesaid five aspects and decide the matter as expeditiously as possible.
We may repeat at the cost of repetition that we request the High Court to dispose it of as expeditiously as possible as the matter has been pending since long.
# In the result, the appeals are allowed.
# The orders passed by the High Court in writ appeals, writ petitions and in the review petitions are set aside and the two writ petitions are remitted to the High Court with the stipulation that the matter shall beadjudicated by a Division Bench in the backdrop of issues formulated by us so that the controversy is put to rest at the High Court level.
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக